As of 1.4.x.x, these are used for more than just chat text and we need
to start handling them separately. The original check here would just
return true (handling the event) for any module that's not text. Now, we
need to actually do processing and check for exploits on these.
As of this commit, the 1.4.0.2 prep work has been completed. This means
that GetDataHandlers & Bouncer have been updated to support changes to
the protocol made up to packet 55. No exploits have been checked for in
TileSend according to him, but this means that subsequent work can start
on packet 56 and work forward.
Really.. time for bed.
The Any wasn't terrible, but itwould have allow cross sending projectiles within that dictionary. (send gold stab with copper in hand, or vice versa etc)
This change moves the ban checks used to determine, during TileEdit
events, if an item is banned, out of Bouncer and into the newly isolated
ItemBan subsystem. Rather than creating a large pull request for all of
these, I'm just going to create a series of commits and send them in one
at a time. This should result in about one PR per hook that uses item
bans that needs to move.
* Remove commented out warning disable
* Add initial ItemBans segregation infrastructure
* Add shell for initial OnSecondUpdate stuff
* Add comments yo
* Remove duplicated logic
* Split out more item ban code
This part of the fragments work is primarily aimed at reducing the
complexity of OnSecondUpdate in TShock and moving that check out into
the ItemBans subsytem.
Of major note in this is the removal of "check", which was a string
variable that tracked state and replacement of many of the item ban
activities with sane private methods that are at least somewhat
sensible. Obviously there's a lot to be desired in this system and I'm
really going for a run here by trying to continue a branch from so long
ago that I barely even remember the whole point of existence.
Still to do: GetDataHandlers related item ban code needs to be moved
into its own hook in the ItemBan system. Finally, there is a downside to
some of this: we're basically iterating over players again and again if
we keep this pattern up, which is kinda lame for complexity purposes.
* alt j: comment changes
* Move item ban check out of main playerupdate check
Separates out item ban logic from the rest of GetDataHandlers so that
item bans is more isolated in terms of what fragments is asking for.
* alt-j: convert indentation to tabs
* alt-j: fix botching source code
* Move item ban related chest checks out of gdh
* Remove chest item change detection from item bans
It doesn't do anything. If a user removes an item from a chest, it
bypasses this check. If a user adds an item to a chest, the server seems
to persist the change anyway, even if the event is handled. That's a bug
for sure, but fundamentally, it's not the item ban system's fault.
* Revert "Remove chest item change detection from item bans"
This reverts commit 758541ac5c4d4096df2db05ba2a398968113e1e4.
* Fix logic issues related to item ban handling
Re-implements chest item handling and correctly handles events and
returns after setting handled event state.
* Remove TSPlayer.HasProjectilePermission
In infinite wisdom, it turns out this is not a good method for TSPlayer
to have. It just checks the states of things as per what the item ban
system says is banned and then creates implicit relationships to the
projectile ban system.
Doing this effectively knocks down another external reference to the
item ban system outside of the context of the implementation for the
system itself and its related hooks.
This commit also adds context around what the heck is going on with some
of our more interesting checks as per discussions in Telegram with @Ijwu
and @QuiCM.
* Update changelog
* Remove useless ref to Projectile.SetDefaults
* Change item ban to ban based on ID not strings
I think I was so confused as to why we were passing strings everywhere
that I just felt inclined to continue the trend in previous commits.
